Eric Chen

I'm an undergraduate and coterminal master's student at Stanford, studying computer science and mathematics. I do research in the Stanford Trustworthy AI Research lab under Professor Sanmi Koyejo. Two summers ago, I researched and shipped my own production ML model at Roblox to perform alt account detection. Last summer, I was also an Algorithm Developer Intern at Hudson River Trading.

I'm generally interested in LLMs, reasoning, evaluation, and benchmarking. Please feel free to reach out to me! I'm always open to chat.

Portrait of Eric Chen.

Contact

Research

  • 2026
    Eric Chen, Aryan Gulati, Brando Miranda†, Zeyu Tang†, Sanmi Koyejo† †equal advising
    ICML 2026 (AI4MATH).

    LLM judges are promising for evaluating reasoned mathematical solutions, yet their scores remain prompt-sensitive and unstable. We evaluate 13 grading strategies on Putnam-AXIOM-Grading, a new 500-problem benchmark with 1,000 mathematically annotated candidate solutions, and IMO-GradingBench. The strategies span direct scoring, structured chain-of-thought, and multi-call pipelines such as G-Eval, Chain-of-Verification, and Debate. No fixed strategy dominates, and the strongest single default, comparative prompting, wins only on average. In hindsight, the best strategy per problem differs from the best fixed default in 76% of cases, revealing substantial oracle headroom for adaptive selection. Motivated by this, we train Mixture of Graders, a ModernBERT-large strategy router, using the fixed-strategy score matrix and human labels, then deploy it using only problem and reference features. On Putnam-AXIOM-Grading, MoG improves over the best fixed strategy across all open-weight judge models, with relative MSE reductions up to 27.8% across both Qwen2.5-72B-Math-Instruct and Mistral-Large-Instruct-2411 student responses. It also generalizes across students, with a router trained on Qwen responses outperforming the best fixed default on Mistral responses. The prescription for difficult mathematical grading is not a single best prompt, but a learned mixture over grader strategies.

  • 2026
    Eric Chen, Aryan Gulati, Brando Miranda†, Zeyu Tang†, Sanmi Koyejo† †equal advising
    ICLR 2026 (LLM Reasoning).

    LLM judges are a promising way to evaluate reasoned mathematical solutions, but their scores are prompt-sensitive, unstable and hard to interpret. We challenge two prevailing assumptions: that chain-of-thought adds little to agreement with human grades, and that multi-step pipelines such as debate or ensembles beat single-step evaluation. On two human-graded competition-mathematics benchmarks, unconstrained chain-of-thought tends to hurt evaluation consistency without moving performance much, while deliberately structured chain-of-thought recovers and often improves agreement — and comparative prompting, a single pass that weighs a solution against a reference, consistently beats the multi-step pipelines.

  • 2025
    Aryan Gulati*, Brando Miranda*, Eric Chen*, Emily Xia*, Kai Fronsdal*, Bruno Dumont, Elyas Obbad, Sanmi Koyejo *equal contribution
    ICML 2025 (Main Conference) and NeurIPS 2024 (MATH-AI). Featured on Hacker News.

    Existing mathematical reasoning benchmarks are nearing saturation, with some models clearing 90%, and are increasingly compromised by training-set contamination. Putnam-AXIOM pairs 522 university-level Putnam competition problems with a companion set of 100 functional variants, produced by programmatically perturbing variables and constants — a protocol that yields an endless supply of equally hard, unseen instances. OpenAI's o1-preview, the strongest model tested, scores 41.9% on the original set but loses 19.6 points on the paired variations; the other eighteen models all decline the same way, ten of them with non-overlapping 95% confidence intervals.

  • 2024
    Kevin Li, Kenan Hasanaliyev, Sally Zhu, George Altshuler, Alden Eberts, Eric Chen, Kate Wang, Emily Xia, Eli Browne, Ian Chen
    Proceedings of the 18th International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation (SemEval-2024), pp. 1463–1467.

    Telling human-written text from machine-generated text gets harder as language models improve. Subtask B of SemEval-2024 Task 8 asks not just whether a passage was machine-generated but which model produced it. We compared RoBERTa and DeBERTa encoders on the task; our DeBERTa model beat the RoBERTa baseline by more than ten points of leaderboard accuracy. PCA and t-SNE projections of the learned embeddings show the model separating the outputs of different LLMs into distinct clusters.

  • 2024
    Katrina Yezzi-Woodley, Alexander Terwilliger, Jiafeng Li, Eric Chen, Martha Tappen, Jeff Calder, Peter Olver
    Journal of Human Evolution, vol. 187. With AMAAZE, University of Minnesota.

    Telling apart the agents that modified bone at paleoanthropological sites underpins much of what we can say about how early hominins exploited large animals. Fracture pattern analysis has struggled with equifinality, and researchers dispute the replicability of existing methods. We present a new approach that extracts a far richer and more transparent feature set from 3D models of fragmentary bone, then applies supervised machine learning to separate hominin breakage from carnivore breakage, averaging around 77% accuracy across tests.

  • 2023
    Eric Chen, Alex Zitzewitz
    Joint Mathematics Meetings 2023; published by the MIT Mathematics Department. From MIT PRIMES-USA.

    We investigate how the accessory parameter of the Heun equation relates to the properties of its monodromy groups, asking specifically which values of that parameter produce unitary groups — ones preserving a Hermitian inner product. Extending earlier work on the Lamé equation, we prove for a broad class of Heun equations that unitarity is tied to the traces of certain monodromy matrices, and turn that theorem into an algorithm for locating the accessory parameters that yield unitary monodromy. We report the values found, draw convergence maps showing the algorithm is robust, and derive an asymptotic formula matching the numerics.

  • 2022
    Eric Chen, Ziji Zhang, Yuefan Deng, Peng Zhang, Miriam Rafailovich
    Oral Presentation at the Materials Research Society, Fall 2022 Meeting. From the Garcia Research Program, Stony Brook University.

    Simulating fibrinogen in solvent atom by atom is prohibitively slow. We built a coarse-grained representation that groups atoms into larger interaction sites, cutting simulation cost while keeping the structural behavior that matters for how the protein folds and binds.

Experience

Projects

AlphaZero-style Gomoku agent

CS 224R · Prof. Chelsea Finn · Apr – June 2025
  • Trained an agent by MCTS and self-play to a 100% win-or-tie rate against human players.
  • Awarded extra credit by Prof. Finn for the model architecture and for the PyTorch, GPU optimization and RL training work behind it.

IGPT: Imitation Game Personal Texter

CS 229 · Profs. Ng, Charikar & Guestrin · Sept – Dec 2024
  • Built a reply system that imitates one person's texting style, comparing LoRA fine-tuning of Llama-2-7B against in-context learning with GPT-4o.
  • Scored both against three yardsticks: friends guessing which replies were real, a Naive Bayes authorship classifier, and BERT embedding similarity.
  • Close friends did barely better than chance at spotting the machine, and in-context learning beat fine-tuning on every measure.

Self-driving perception models

CS 231N · Prof. Fei-Fei Li · Apr – June 2024
  • Built road image classification (~100% accuracy) and road object detection (~65% accuracy) models.
  • Wrote modular PyTorch implementations of MLPs, ConvNets and ResNets.
  • Worked with a team of peers on GitHub in a virtual AWS environment.

MIT PRIMES-USA

Mathematics Researcher · Jan 2022 – May 2024
  • Complex analysis research with a partner under Prof. Pavel Etingof and mentor David Darrow.
  • Wrote gradient descent algorithms in Python and MATLAB to analyze Lamé and Heun differential equations.
  • Built heat map and contour plot visualizations in MATLAB and Matplotlib.

Honors & Awards

Curriculum Vitae

Download full CV (PDF)

Not-so-serious stuff

Piano and singing

I'm a big fan of pop, rap, C-pop, and classical music. I've played the piano since I was 5, and I'm a big fan of Chopin.

Cycling and the outdoors

I love biking around Stanford campus and around my home state of Minnesota. I've also gotten into climbing and running.

Puzzles and games

Escape rooms, board games, and video games. Kind of nerdy but I like it.